ArticleGHM open2024
Do hilar clamping and renorrhaphy influence postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy?
Article in GHM open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preservation of renal function is an important goal of partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors. Several attempts to preserve postoperative renal function, including hilar control surgery and omission of renal cortical renorrhaphy, have been reported, but the influence of each procedure remains controversial. We conducted a literature review based on PubMed to summarize the current situation and clarify the influence of each procedure on postoperative renal function. Effects of hilar control, omitting renorrhaphy, and a combination of both on post- PN renal function were reviewed. While hilar clamping does not influence postoperative renal function, cortical renorrhaphy tends to deteriorate. Parenchymal ischemia/reperfusion by hilar clamping leads to acute kidney injury through production of radical oxygen species. Recent randomized controlled studies, however, showed no differences in the postoperative renal function between on- and off-clamp laparoscopic PN. Finally, the effects of soft coagulation on renal parenchymal denaturation and postoperative renal function were reviewed. Although soft coagulation can lead to denaturation and necrosis of the renal parenchyma, the shortened warm ischemic time might positively affect postoperative renal function. In conclusion, off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy PN is feasible and safe for small renal tumors. Renorrhaphy, but not hilar clamping, tends to worsen postoperative renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.