Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144747›Full record

ArticleGHM open2024

Do hilar clamping and renorrhaphy influence postoperative renal function after partial nephrectomy?

Masaki Nakamura, Ibuki Tsuru, Yoshiyuki Shiga, Shuji Kameyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GHM open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masaki NakamuraDepartment of Urology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ibuki TsuruDepartment of Urology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki ShigaDepartment of Urology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuji KameyamaTokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of renal function is an important goal of partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors. Several attempts to preserve postoperative renal function, including hilar control surgery and omission of renal cortical renorrhaphy, have been reported, but the influence of each procedure remains controversial. We conducted a literature review based on PubMed to summarize the current situation and clarify the influence of each procedure on postoperative renal function. Effects of hilar control, omitting renorrhaphy, and a combination of both on post- PN renal function were reviewed. While hilar clamping does not influence postoperative renal function, cortical renorrhaphy tends to deteriorate. Parenchymal ischemia/reperfusion by hilar clamping leads to acute kidney injury through production of radical oxygen species. Recent randomized controlled studies, however, showed no differences in the postoperative renal function between on- and off-clamp laparoscopic PN. Finally, the effects of soft coagulation on renal parenchymal denaturation and postoperative renal function were reviewed. Although soft coagulation can lead to denaturation and necrosis of the renal parenchyma, the shortened warm ischemic time might positively affect postoperative renal function. In conclusion, off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy PN is feasible and safe for small renal tumors. Renorrhaphy, but not hilar clamping, tends to worsen postoperative renal function.

Indexed as

estimated glomerular filtration ratekidney failurenephrectomyorgan preservation

Identifiers

PMID40144747
PMCPMC11933945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.