ReviewJHLT open2025
Anticoagulation Management During ECMO: Narrative Review.
Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consensus statement of the Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy on the use of VV ECMO in paediatric patients for the treatment of acute respiratory failure.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2026Article
- Intestinal Ischaemia and Perforation After Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for Acute Exacerbation of Interstitial Lung Disease: An Autopsy Case.Respirology case reports · 2026Article
- Single-Center Experience with 15 VitalFlow ECMO Deployments for VA- and VV-ECMO Support: Deployment Characteristics, Outcomes, and Complications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Association of chronic kidney disease with in-hospital mortality of cardiogenic shock patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Alternate and Emerging Anticoagulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early VV-ECMO enabling immunosuppressive therapy in severe diffuse alveolar hemorrhage due to ANCA-associated vasculitis.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning based detection of cellular deposits on clinically used ECMO membrane lungs.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Prolonged Thromboelastography R Time and Thrombocytopenia as Early Warning Indicators of Bleeding in ECMO Patients Who Developed Sepsis During Support: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- A Contemporary Guide of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Postpartum cardiomyopathy with severe complications: multimodal management and long-term recovery.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Drug Therapy in ECMO-Supported Critically Ill Adults: A Narrative Review and Clinical Guide.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A patient with acute pulmonary embolism caused by hyaluronic acid injection underwent nursing care of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support therapy: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The role of extracorporeal COFrontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Is Antithrombin Supplementation Effective in Suppressing ECMO Circuit Thrombosis in Sepsis?Juntendo medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a critical intervention for patients with severe respiratory or cardiac failure, requiring careful management of anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic complications. This review examines current practices and challenges in ECMO anticoagulation, focusing on strategies, agents, and emerging insights. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains the most commonly used anticoagulant, monitored via activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or activated clotting time (ACT). Increasing attention is given to alternative tools like anti-Xa and viscoelastic assays (VEA), which offer potentially more reliable results. Supplementation with antithrombin should be considered if levels fall below 50%-70% to optimize heparin efficacy. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is occasionally used due to its predictable pharmacokinetics, though challenges in dosing and reversal limit its application. Direct thrombin inhibitors, such as bivalirudin, are valuable alternatives, particularly for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), though their cost and availability remain barriers. Anticoagulation in ECMO patients is complex, balancing the risks of thrombosis and bleeding. Factors such as patient age, underlying conditions, and ECMO-induced coagulopathies complicate management. Personalized anticoagulation protocols and point-of-care VEA are emerging as effective tools for improving therapy. Routine no-anticoagulation strategies are not recommended unless there are significant bleeding complications. Ongoing research into novel anticoagulants and the long-term impact of anticoagulation on ECMO outcomes is critical. Anticoagulation management in ECMO continues to evolve, focusing on individualized approaches, improved monitoring, and better outcomes. Standardized protocols and further research are essential for optimizing care in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.