ArticleGHM open2022
Knowledge and practice for cervical cancer among female primary school teachers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia: A cross-sectional phone-based survey.
Article in GHM open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a cancer with evidence-based and cost-effective preventive measures; Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination for school girls and cancer screening for women. In Cambodia, cervical cancer accounts for an estimated 11.4% and 10.4% of women's cancer and deaths in 2020, respectively. This study aimed to identify the knowledge of cervical cancer, its information sources, and the experiences of cervical cancer screening among female primary school teachers, who are key influencers of HPV vaccination. A cross-sectional study was conducted using telephone interviews with 100 female primary school teachers in Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia. All 100 participants had heard of cervical cancer, 94 (94%) had heard of screening, and 49 (49%) had ever undergone a screening. When asked about their knowledge regarding cause(s), symptom(s), detection, and treatment(s) of cervical cancer, 31%, 44%, 35%, and 55% respondents said "Do not know". Those who did not reply "Do not know" were asked open-ended questions. Many of their answers were judged as incorrectby gynecologists. Consequently only 1%, 38%, 63% and 28% of respondents replied with at least one correct answer regarding cause(s), symptom(s), detection and treatment(s) respectively. The most common sources of information were family and friends, followed by doctors, television, and the Internet. Among female primary school teachers with an above-average educational level, their knowledge of cervical cancer was generally low. To promote cervical cancer prevention, it is necessary to provide correct knowledge in a broad and accessible manner through involvement of local medical doctors and healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.