Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144691›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Development and validation of a deep learning-based automated computed tomography image segmentation and diagnostic model for infectious hydronephrosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Cong Lai, Zhensheng Hu, Jiamin Zhu, Mingzhou Dai, Xuanhao Qi, Qiliang Zhai, Yunhan Luo, Chunnuan Deng, Juanyi Shi, Zhuohang Li and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cong LaiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Zhensheng HuDepartment of Medical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510000, Guangzhou, China.
Jiamin ZhuDepartment of Urology, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, 517000, Guangdong, China.
Mingzhou DaiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Xuanhao QiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510000, Guangzhou, China.
Qiliang ZhaiDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Yunhan LuoDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Chunnuan DengDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Juanyi ShiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Zhuohang LiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Zhikai WuDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Xingnan LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
Yuli ZhaoMedical Imaging Centre, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Xuecheng BiDepartment of Urology, Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, 517000, Guangdong, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Medical Informatics, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, 510000, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng LiuDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.
Xin HuangDepartment of Urology, Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Kewei XuDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurately diagnosing whether hydronephrosis is complicated by infection is crucial for guiding appropriate clinical treatment. This study aimed to develop a fully automated segmentation and non-invasive diagnostic model for infectious hydronephrosis (IH) using CT images and a deep learning algorithm. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical information and annotated cross-sectional CT images from patients diagnosed with hydronephrosis between June 2, 2019 and June 30, 2024 at the Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital (SYSMH), Heyuan People's Hospital (HPH), and Ganzhou People's Hospital (GPH) was performed. Data on cases of hydronephrosis were extracted from the hospital's medical record system. The SYSMH cohort was randomly divided into two subsets: the SYSMH training set (n = 279) and the SYSMH validation set (n = 93) in a 3:1 ratio. The HPH cohort and GPH cohort serve as external validation sets. A hydronephrosis segmentation model (HRSM) was developed using the Improved U-Net algorithm, and the segmentation accuracy evaluated by the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Using 3D Convolutional Neural Network established an IH risk score (IHRS) based on segmented images. Independent risk clinical data for IH were screened by logistic regression. An IH diagnostic model (IHDM) was then developed, incorporating the IHRS and clinical data, using five machine learning algorithms (Random Forests, K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine). The diagnostic performance of the IHDM was assessed by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Findings: The study initially included 1464 potential eligible cases, of which 864 were deemed qualified after preliminary examination. Ultimately, a total of 615 patients (363 female and 252 male) with hydronephrosis (including 5876 annotated cross-sectional CT images) were included in the study, 372 of whom were from SYSMH, 123 from HPH, and 120 from GPH. Based on bacterial culture results from percutaneous nephrostomy drainage of hydronephrosis, 291 cases were classified as IH, while 324 were non-IH. The DSC for the HRSM in the internal and two external validation cohorts were 0.922 (95% CI: 0.895, 0.949), 0.906 (95% CI: 0.869, 0.943), and 0.883 (95% CI: 0.857, 0.909), respectively, indicating high segmentation accuracy. The IHRS achieved a prediction accuracy of 78.5% (95% CI: 78.1%-78.9%) in the internal validation set. The IHDM developed using Support Vector Machine (SVM) combination with blood neutrophil count, fever within one week of history and IHRS performed best, demonstrated areas under the ROC curve of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.859-0.980), 0.902 (95% CI: 0.849-0.955), and 0.863 (95% CI: 0.800-0.926) in three cohorts, respectively. Interpretation: The automated HRSM demonstrated excellent segmentation performance for hydronephrosis, while the non-invasive IHDM provided significant diagnostic efficacy, facilitating infection assessment in patients with hydronephrosis. However, more diverse real-world multicenter validation studies are needed to verify the robustness of the model before it can be incorporated into clinical practice. Funding: The Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Indexed as

Automatic segmentationDeep learningInfectious hydronephrosisKidney CT plain scanNoninvasive diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID40144691
PMCPMC11938262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.