ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and prognostic biomarker analysis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exosomes and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Knowledge and Clinical Significance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant therapy efficacy in breast cancer based on the HALP score.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram based on HER2 status for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a common and effective treatment modality for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The primary goal is to reduce the size of the primary tumor, enabling breast-conserving surgery, axillary preservation, and a transition to operability, thereby providing patients with more therapeutic options. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated favorable outcomes in clinical practice, predicting its efficacy and prognostic value in TNBC remains a key challenge in current clinical research. Methods: This study included 248 TNBC patients who received NAC at two breast cancer treatment centers. By employing a modeling validation approach, we aim to explore predictors of treatment efficacy and potential prognostic biomarkers associated with NAC. Results: In the multivariable analysis of the training set, the factors predicting the pathological complete response (pCR) to NAC in TNBC patients include high biopsy-sTILs expression, biopsy-Ki67 > 20%, and positive expression of biopsy-androgen receptor (AR). The factors predicting disease-free survival (DFS) are ypN3, high postoperative sTIL expression, receipt of postoperative radiotherapy, and effective NAC. The factors predicting overall survival (OS) include ypN2, ypN3, high postoperative sTIL expression, postoperative Ki67 > 20%, receipt of postoperative radiotherapy, and effective NAC. The C-indices in the training and validation sets for the prediction of pCR using the nomogram were 0.729 and 0.816, respectively. The C-indices for predicting DFS were 0.895 and 0.865, respectively. The C-indices for predicting OS were 0.899 and 0.860, respectively. Conclusion: This study established and validated a nomogram model predicting the pCR, DFS, and OS in TNBC patients undergoing NAC. This model demonstrates good discrimination and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.