ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of dexamethasone combined with intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of pediatric autoimmune encephalitis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination Versus Monotherapy in Acute Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis: A Real-World Dose Optimization Analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Article
- Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms, Dual Roles, and Therapeutic Strategies in Neurological Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) have been established as the primary therapeutic agents for treating autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methylprednisolone is the most frequently utilized glucocorticoid; however, the potential advantages of dexamethasone (DEX) in the management of encephalitis have yet to be fully elucidated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of DEX in combination with IVIG in the treatment of pediatric AE. Methods: This retrospective study included 41 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with AE and were categorized into two groups on the basis of their treatment history. Group A ( Results: Ninety percent of the patients were severely ill prior to DEX+IVIG treatment (mRS = 3.8 ± 1.0). Following treatment, the clinical symptoms of children in both the nonacute stage (Group A) and the acute stage (Group B) significantly improved. At the final follow-up, 90.2% of patients (mRS = 0-2) exhibited a favorable prognosis, with a complete response rate (mRS = 0) of 43.9% and a relapse rate of 2.4%. Children who experienced relapse were treated with DEX+IVIG, leading to a positive outcome. No severe adverse events were observed during treatment. The results of this study indicated that DEX+IVIG is an effective treatment for children with acute, nonacute, and relapsing AE. Discussion: DEX+IVIG was shown to be beneficial at the acute, nonacute, sequelae, and recurrence stages of AE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.