Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144599›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Qualitative research in cardiac surgery: importance, challenges, and opportunities.

Eka Narayan, Ramsah Cheah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eka NarayanHull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX UK.ORCID 0009-0009-1555-2039
Ramsah CheahHull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research in cardiac surgery remains underutilised despite its crucial role in understanding patient experiences and improving care delivery. Cardiac surgery has traditionally been dominated by quantitative research and despite its clear value, qualitative research remains underutilised in cardiac surgery. This narrative review highlights key qualitative findings in valve replacement procedures, including patient autonomy in decision-making, post-operative challenges, and financial burdens. Mixed-methods research combining quantitative and qualitative approaches offers a comprehensive framework for addressing complex healthcare challenges. We propose strategic areas for future qualitative research and recommend increased integration of qualitative methodologies in cardiac surgical practice.

Indexed as

Cardiac surgeryQualitative researchQuantitative research

Identifiers

PMID40144599
PMCPMC11933489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.