ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
A multi-modal deep learning solution for precise pneumonia diagnosis: the PneumoFusion-Net model.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning Approaches for Lung Disease Detection: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Clinical role of miR-1271-5p in severe pediatric pneumonia and its prognostic value.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Exploratory association between multimodal AI-derived digital biomarkers and in-hospital mortality in adult patients with pneumonia: A proof-of-concept study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Improving the Prediction of Radiation Pneumonitis: Leveraging Radiomics and Dosiomics Within IDLSS Lung Subregions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumonia is considered one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. Bacterial and viral pneumonia share many similar clinical features, thus making diagnosis a challenging task. Traditional diagnostic method developments mainly rely on radiological imaging and require a certain degree of consulting clinical experience, which can be inefficient and inconsistent. Deep learning for the classification of pneumonia in multiple modalities, especially integrating multiple data, has not been well explored. Methods: The study introduce the PneumoFusion-Net, a deep learning-based multimodal framework that incorporates CT images, clinical text, numerical lab test results, and radiology reports for improved diagnosis. In the experiments, a dataset of 10,095 pneumonia CT images was used-including associated clinical data-most of which was used for training and validation while keeping part of it for validation on a held-out test set. Five-fold cross-validation was considered in order to evaluate this model, calculating different metrics including accuracy and F1-Score. Results: PneumoFusion-Net, which achieved 98.96% classification accuracy with a 98% F1-score on the held-out test set, is highly effective in distinguishing bacterial from viral types of pneumonia. This has been highly beneficial for diagnosis, reducing misdiagnosis and further improving homogeneity across various data sets from multiple patients. Conclusion: PneumoFusion-Net offers an effective and efficient approach to pneumonia classification by integrating diverse data sources, resulting in high diagnostic accuracy. Its potential for clinical integration could significantly reduce the burden of pneumonia diagnosis by providing radiologists and clinicians with a robust, automated diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.