Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144536›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Medicaid Patient Experiences with Nurse Practitioners and Other Providers: A Big Data Analysis.

DeAnna Jan Emory, Thomas A Kippenbrock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

DeAnna Jan EmoryEpley Center for Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6581-3884
Thomas A KippenbrockEpley Center for Health Professions, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a current and ongoing shortage of primary care providers that is projected to increase through 2034. Over the last decade, this shortage has resulted in increased reliance on nurse practitioners and physician assistants to fill the gap. The purpose of this study was to investigate Medicaid recipients' experiences with their respective primary care providers using responses from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems database with a focus on nurse practitioners compared to other provider types identified. Responses from 68,761 Medicaid recipients were analyzed. The results showed that Medicaid recipients' scores for nurse practitioners were comparable to their peer primary care provider types. Areas for improvement were noted. Primary care services provided by nurse practitioners can contribute to the quality goals set by national healthcare organizations for quality and cost-effectiveness of care. This study expands the knowledge about nurse practitioners and other providers in the primary care role.

Indexed as

healthcare relationshipsMedicaidnurse practitionerspatient experienceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40144536
PMCPMC11938442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.