Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144533›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025

Applicant Factors for Matching Into an Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Fellowship.

Zachary C Lum, Kyle Astleford, Christopher Kreulen, Eric Giza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary C LumOrthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-8539
Kyle AstlefordOrthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9562-3636
Christopher KreulenOrthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-6053
Eric GizaOrthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over the past 2 decades, various initiatives have aimed to enhance diversity in orthopaedic surgery, promoting greater racial, ethnic, and gender equity. Building on this progress, demographic data on orthopaedic fellowship matches has been collected over the last 3 years. This study seeks to analyze trends in applicants to foot and ankle fellowships, characterize the applicant pool, and identify traits associated with successful matches. Methods: All applicant information from a fellowship application service site was obtained for match years 2022-2024. Applicants were selected only if they applied to the specific subspecialty fellowship. Gender, race, and ethnicity were recorded. Applicant factors such as Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) status, Gold Humanitarian status, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 score, number of applications, and number of interview invitations were used. Applicant medical school status, including allopathic, osteopathic, Canadian, and foreign medical graduate (FMG) were analyzed. χ Results: There were 286 applicants, 82.8% males, 16.5% females, 133 US- and Canadian-trained graduates, and 153 FMGs. The match rate for US- and Canadian-trained graduates was 99.2% compared with FMGs, which was 43.7% and associated with lower matching rates ( Conclusion: Nearly all US-trained foot and ankle applicants matched, whereas FMG applicants matched 43% of the time.

Indexed as

fellowshipinterviewsstatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID40144533
PMCPMC11938521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.