Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144529›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Review of applications of deep learning in veterinary diagnostics and animal health.

Sam Xiao, Navneet K Dhand, Zhiyong Wang, Kun Hu, Peter C Thomson, John K House, Mehar S Khatkar

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sam XiaoFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Navneet K DhandFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Zhiyong WangSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia.
Kun HuSchool of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia.
Peter C ThomsonFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
John K HouseFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.
Mehar S KhatkarFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL), a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), involves the development of algorithms and models that simulate the problem-solving capabilities of the human mind. Sophisticated AI technology has garnered significant attention in recent years in the domain of veterinary medicine. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the research dedicated to leveraging DL for diagnostic purposes within veterinary medicine. Our systematic review approach followed PRISMA guidelines, focusing on the intersection of DL and veterinary medicine, and identified 422 relevant research articles. After exporting titles and abstracts for screening, we narrowed our selection to 39 primary research articles directly applying DL to animal disease detection or management, excluding non-primary research, reviews, and unrelated AI studies. Key findings from the current body of research highlight an increase in the utilisation of DL models across various diagnostic areas from 2013 to 2024, including radiography (33% of the studies), cytology (33%), health record analysis (8%), MRI (8%), environmental data analysis (5%), photo/video imaging (5%), and ultrasound (5%). Over the past decade, radiographic imaging has emerged as most impactful. Various studies have demonstrated notable success in the classification of primary thoracic lesions and cardiac disease from radiographs using DL models compared to specialist veterinarian benchmarks. Moreover, the technology has proven adept at recognising, counting, and classifying cell types in microscope slide images, demonstrating its versatility across different veterinary diagnostic modality. While deep learning shows promise in veterinary diagnostics, several challenges remain. These challenges range from the need for large and diverse datasets, the potential for interpretability issues and the importance of consulting with experts throughout model development to ensure validity. A thorough understanding of these considerations for the design and implementation of DL in veterinary medicine is imperative for driving future research and development efforts in the field. In addition, the potential future impacts of DL on veterinary diagnostics are discussed to explore avenues for further refinement and expansion of DL applications in veterinary medicine, ultimately contributing to increased standards of care and improved health outcomes for animals as this technology continues to evolve.

Indexed as

automated disease detectioncomputer visiondeep learningdigital pathologyimage analysismachine learningneural networks

Identifiers

PMID40144529
PMCPMC11938132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.