ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Research publications and global manufacture of veterinary vaccines against avian influenza A (2019-2023).
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The characteristics of the avian influenza virus and its worldwide spread have led to intense and unprecedented scientific activity and industrial production for preventive veterinary vaccines. However, knowledge gaps remain regarding the best strategies to prevent epidemiological events in the future. In this context, the present study aimed to provide a global analysis on the scientific and industrial production of avian influenza type A vaccines for farm animals and pets during the period 2019 2023. The Scopus database was used as the primary source of information (12,162 keywords, 2,437 scientific articles, 659 academic journals, and 46 countries) for the academic analysis, while technical information posted on official institutional websites (136 commercial formulations, 24 vaccines manufacturers, and 17 countries) was collected to conduct the industrial analysis. 3,045, 25.0%) exhibited the highest levels of co-occurrence in the sciences; the journal Vaccine was the most productive in terms of articles (11.8%, 288/2,437), and the countries with the most publications were the USA (25.5%, 622/2,437) and China (23.1%, 564/2,437). The most internationally marketed vaccines were inactivated (86.0%, 117/136), avian (47.1%, 64/136), and combined (52.2%, 71/136) vaccines as well as those containing Newcastle antigens (38.0%, 27/71). In conclusion, the study demonstrated the fundamental role of classical production methods (based on the use of the whole pathogen) in avian influenza A research and the production of veterinary vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.