ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Role of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1/2 in secondary injury after cerebral hemorrhage.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential Therapeutic Targets and Emerging Strategies to Promote Hematoma Resolution in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Revista de neurologia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a common severe emergency in neurosurgery, causing tremendous economic pressure on families and society and devastating effects on patients both physically and psychologically, especially among patients with poor functional outcomes. ICH is often accompanied by decreased consciousness and limb dysfunction. This seriously affects patients' ability to live independently. Although rapid advances in neurosurgery have greatly improved patient survival, there remains insufficient evidence that surgical treatment significantly improves long-term outcomes. With in-depth pathophysiological studies after ICH, increasing evidence has shown that secondary injury after ICH is related to long-term prognosis and that the key to secondary injury is various immune-mediated neuroinflammatory reactions after ICH. In basic and clinical studies of various systemic inflammatory diseases, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1/2 (TREM-1/2), and the TREM receptor family is closely related to the inflammatory response. Various inflammatory diseases can be upregulated and downregulated through receptor intervention. How the TREM receptor functions after ICH, the types of results from intervention, and whether the outcomes can improve secondary brain injury and the long-term prognosis of patients are unknown. An analysis of relevant research results from basic and clinical trials revealed that the inhibition of TREM-1 and the activation of TREM-2 can alleviate the neuroinflammatory immune response, significantly improve the long-term prognosis of neurological function in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, and thus improve the ability of patients to live independently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.