Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144463›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2024

Retrospective study on pain management pathway for patients with suspected renal/ ureteric colic in a U.K. accidents and emergency department: A quality improvement project.

Charles Ojo, Chijioke Orji, Olorungbami Anifalaje, Gourav Garg, Mariette Anto, Megan Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles OjoEmergency Department, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE21 9QS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7995-9852
Chijioke OrjiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, England, TR1 3LJ, UK.
Olorungbami AnifalajeEmergency Department, Dumfies and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Cargenbridge, Dumfries, DG2 8RX, UK.
Gourav GargEmergency Department, King's Mill Hospital, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL, UK.
Mariette AntoEmergency Department, King's Mill Hospital, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, NG17 4JL, UK.
Megan KellyEmergency Department, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston, Lincolnshire, PE21 9QS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In acute settings around the globe, renal/ureteric colic remains one of the most common diagnoses for patients presenting with loin-to-groin pain. Even though management spans from medical expulsive therapies to surgical options, pain as a significant component of a patient's presentation must be dealt with quickly, decisively, and safely, as it can be excruciating and its effects on overall health are dire. This study aimed to explore compliance with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for pain management in patients with suspected renal/ureteric colic. It includes the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intravenous paracetamol, and opioids as first-, second-, and third-line analgesics, respectively, and does not offer antispasmodics. In the event of deviations from the standard, the aim was to put in corrective measures, followed by re-exploration of compliance with patient care. Methods: This study involved a single healthcare facility with the study type being retrospective before interventions and prospective after interventions. In the first cycle, we retrieved and analysed 78 patients records whom had been suspected to have renal/ureteric colic between July and September 2022. The inclusion criteria were documented complaints of "flank/loin-to-groin pain" and diagnosis prior to performing diagnostic tests. We surveyed the first-, second-, and third-line painkillers issued, and whether an antispasmodic was given. We collected and entered data into a Microsoft Excel file and correlated it with NICE standards. Having found deviations from the standard, we conducted interventions, allowed time for clinicians to adapt, and re-explored compliance using patient case records [n=58] between February and May 2023. Results: In the 1 Conclusion: Clinicians' ability to correctly diagnose renal/ureteric colic is remarkable. However, the pain management compliance rate indicates room for improvement. This may be due to the limited awareness of the NICE guideline or the fact that the clinical team has an affinity for certain analgesics compared to others. We propose the need to consider select variables to existing standard guidelines to enhance compliance for improved patient care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPain ManagementQuality ImprovementRenal ColicAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalcolicCT-KUB.NSAIDsopioidsparacetamolRenalstonesureteric

Identifiers

PMID40144463
PMCPMC11937778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.