ArticleCureus2025
Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation Orders in Older Adult Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Single-Center Retrospective Study at an Urban University Hospital Emergency Department in Japan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Despite its super-aging society, advance directives or physician orders for life-sustaining treatment are uncommon in Japan. This study aimed to determine the incidence of do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders in older adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan and whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation was canceled based on these orders. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest aged ≥65 years who were transported to and treated at Keio University Hospital emergency department between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest, those treated by clinical departments other than the emergency department, and those transported from other hospitals were not included. We assessed the rate of DNAR orders and cardiopulmonary resuscitation terminations in patients in the emergency department with DNAR orders. Results Among the 142 included patients, 23 (16%) had not attempted resuscitation orders made by the patients or family members. Of these, six (26%) underwent continued cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite their DNAR orders. The reasons for continuing cardiopulmonary resuscitation were delays in confirming the DNAR orders and problems in understanding the DNAR orders. Patients of higher age, male sex, nursing home admission, and continued medical examination at our hospital were significantly more likely to desire DNAR orders. Conclusions In Japan, the number of DNAR orders among older adults is low. Furthermore, these orders are not sufficiently understood, even by medical workers. Thus, increased medical and social awareness of advance directives and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.