ArticleCureus2025
Monkeypox in a Non-endemic Setting: Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of an Atypical Case.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monkeypox is a zoonotic viral disease caused by the monkeypox virus, an Orthopoxvirus closely related to smallpox. While historically confined to endemic regions in Africa, recent outbreaks have demonstrated its capacity to spread globally, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We present the case of a 28-year-old previously healthy Caucasian male who repeatedly sought care in the emergency department (ED) for nonspecific flu-like symptoms, including fever, lymphadenopathy, dysphagia, and a progressive vesiculopustular rash. The initial lack of a clear clinical picture led to multiple misdiagnoses and treatments for presumed bacterial infections. Despite multiple evaluations and initial misdiagnoses, the persistence and progression of symptoms - including worsening lymphadenopathy, dysphagia, and a vesiculopustular rash with umbilicated lesions - raised concern for an Orthopoxvirus infection. Given the patient's history of intimate contact with a male partner who had recently traveled internationally, monkeypox became a key diagnostic consideration. Other possible differential diagnoses included bacterial tonsillitis, peritonsillar abscess, syphilis, varicella, and other sexually transmitted infections. This evolving clinical picture prompted expedited non-variola Orthopoxvirus DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, which ultimately confirmed the diagnosis. This report highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by monkeypox in non-endemic settings, where healthcare providers may have limited familiarity with the disease. It demonstrates the need for heightened clinical suspicion in patients with compatible symptoms, especially during outbreak periods. The patient's subsequent treatment with tecovirimat demonstrated its potential effectiveness in mitigating symptoms and improving outcomes when initiated promptly. Additionally, this report emphasizes the crucial role of public health measures, including robust surveillance systems such as enhanced case reporting, rapid diagnostic testing networks, and contact tracing programs, alongside healthcare provider education and vaccination strategies, in combating the spread of this reemerging infectious disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.