ReviewCureus2025
Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Management of Stage III and IV Degenerative Disc Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Lumbar Disc Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery combined with platelet-rich plasma for lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Evolving Landscape of Regenerative Therapies: Cell-Based and Cell-Free Approaches for Chronic Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk factors for residual low back pain at twelve months after low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation in lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative disc disease is a common disorder that can significantly impact patients' quality of life, leading to chronic pain and disability. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is emerging as a potential treatment for degenerative disc disease. The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of PRP in the management of degenerative disc disease types III and IV. This is a scoping literature review. The online database PUBMED was used, and papers were searched using the keywords: ("PRP" OR "platelet-rich plasma") AND ("degenerative disk disease" OR "disk degeneration" OR "intradiscal injection" OR "discogenic pain" OR "intervertebral disc degeneration" OR "degenerative disk disease" OR "intervertebral disc disease"). Clinical studies evaluating the role of PRP in the management of stage III and IV degenerative disc disease were included in the study. Systematic reviews, animal studies, in vitro studies, case reports, study designs, case reports, and studies in languages other than English were excluded. The present study includes 14 studies. PRP has been found to promote tissue regeneration and modulate inflammatory response in degenerated discs. PRP can be administered mostly intradiscally but also epidurally. The benefits of PRP use include pain reduction, improvement of functionality, and low risk of adverse events. The effect of intradiscal PRP injections is similar to steroid injections. A higher concentration of platelets is associated with enhanced clinical outcomes. PRP therapy represents a promising avenue for tissue healing and regeneration across degenerative disc disease. While the evidence supporting its efficacy is encouraging, further research is needed to elucidate its mechanisms of action, optimize treatment protocols, and expand its clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.