Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144392›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Africa and zero hunger agenda: genome editing policy landscape, challenges and opportunities.

Olalekan Akinbo, Bongani Nkhabindze, Josephine Amedu, Rufus Ebegba, Agnes Asagbra, Billy Omboki Ratemo, Susan Angira Dada, Anne Muia, Roy Mugiira, Lilian Chimphepo and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Olalekan Akinbo *African Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.
Bongani NkhabindzeAfrican Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.
Josephine AmeduNational Biosafety Management Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
Rufus EbegbaNational Biosafety Management Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
Agnes AsagbraNational Biosafety Management Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
Billy Omboki RatemoAfrican Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.
Susan Angira DadaAfrican Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.
Anne MuiaNational Biosafety Authority, Nairobi, Kenya.
Roy MugiiraNational Biosafety Authority, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lilian ChimphepoNational Biosafety Authority, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Leeford Oko WristbergNational Biosafety Authority, Accra, Ghana.
Mathurin W RouambaAgence Nationale de Biosécurité (ANB), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Koussao SomeAgence Nationale de Biosécurité (ANB), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Valter N A NuailaCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia e Biociencias (CNBB), Maputo, Mozambique.
Alsácia AtanásioCentro Nacional de Biotecnologia e Biociencias (CNBB), Maputo, Mozambique.
Olufunke Bolatito ShittuDepartment of Microbiology, College of Bioscience, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Charles Oluwaseun AdetunjiDepartment of Microbiology, Edo State University, Auchi, Nigeria.
Loubna HamidiInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Elinasi MongaInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Silas ObukosiaAfrican Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.
Muyiwa Seyi Adegbaju *Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.
Samuel AcheampongDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Estherine FotabongAfrican Union Development Agency - NEPAD (AUDA-NEPAD), Directorate of Agriculture, Food Security and Environmental Sustainability, Midrand, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Africa has historically struggled to adopt innovative agricultural technologies, which has significantly hindered efforts to ensure food security and improve livelihoods over the past century. A major obstacle in this regard has been the persistent skepticism surrounding the potential benefits of agricultural biotechnology. The challenges contributing to this skepticism include a notable knowledge gap among stakeholders, widespread technophobia, or fear of technology, as well as inconsistencies with global agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBB). Although these challenges are not exclusive to Africa, they disproportionately impact the continent, making the need for effective solutions even more urgent. This paper investigates the national government policy landscape in five African countries that are poised to create a regulatory environment conducive to deploying genome editing technology for improved agricultural productivity. This exploration aligns with the continental agricultural policy initiatives, notably the "CAADP Malabo Declaration" and the soon-to-be-signed "CAADP Kampala Declaration." Aligning with the African Union's continental agenda on agricultural transformation, as outlined in the Malabo Declaration and other key documents, is crucial for adopting innovative agricultural technologies like genome editing. Such alignment becomes increasingly critical for realizing the objectives set forth in the post-Malabo Declaration, with the Kampala Declaration playing a vital role in its implementation. This cohesive approach will not only foster agricultural innovation but also expedite development across the continent, addressing the pressing needs of food security and livelihoods in Africa.

Indexed as

agriculture biotechnologyfood securitygenome editingpolicy landscapetechnophobia

Identifiers

PMID40144392
PMCPMC11936932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.