ArticleCellulose (London, England)2025
Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose with a mesh dispenser vessel-based bioreactor.
Article in Cellulose (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus using agro-derived flour nitrogen sources.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Exploring Genome-Wide Mutation Dynamics and Bacterial Cellulose Impairment inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Acoustofluidics Powered Synthesis of Bacterial Cellulose.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial cellulose (BC) has gained significant interest for various applications due to its useful properties which include chemical stability and strong physical properties as well as its biocompatibility. However, conventional fabrication methods are limited by a lack of control over the form, particularly depth and thickness, restricting BC applications to 2D planar shapes. The production of BC is constrained by the formation of a pellicle at the liquid-air interface. To overcome this constraint and enable continuous pellicle formation, a method was established to combine intermittent batch feeding with a supportive mesh scaffold. Intermittent feeding supplies nutrients to the pellicle, promoting sustained formation at the liquid-air interface, while the supporting mesh anchors the initial pellicle to prevent submersion. This approach facilitates the continuous growth of BC pellicle at a controlled rate. Moreover, the method described here results in a single BC pellicle with enhanced thickness, weight (both wet and dry states), water-holding capacity and mechanical strength. Continuous growth is achievable with ongoing nutrient supply, allowing for precise control over the final pellicle thickness. This culturing method is scalable and has been tested for volumes ranging from 250 mL to 10 L, and significantly increases glucose-to-cellulose conversion (3.4-fold) and water utilization efficiency (2.4-fold). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10570-024-06367-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.