Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144293›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

An associative account of collective learning.

Matthew Gildea, Cristina Santos, Federico Sanabria, Takao Sasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. An associative account of collective learning.Royal Society open science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew GildeaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9413-8341
Cristina SantosDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Federico SanabriaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Takao SasakiOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7923-9855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associative learning is an important adaptive mechanism that is well conserved among a broad range of species. Although it is typically studied in isolated animals, associative learning can occur in the presence of conspecifics in nature. Although many social aspects of individual learning have received much attention, the study of collective learning-the acquisition of knowledge in groups of animals through shared experience-has a much shorter history. Consequently, the conditions under which collective learning emerges and the mechanisms that underlie such emergence are still largely unexplored. Here, we develop a parsimonious model of collective learning based on the complementary integration of associative learning and collective intelligence. The model assumes (i) a simple associative learning rule, based on the Rescorla-Wagner model, in which the actions of conspecifics serve as cues and (ii) a horse-race action selection rule. Simulations of this model show no benefit of group training over individual training in a simple discrimination task (A+/B-). However, a group-training advantage emerges after the discrimination task is reversed (A-/B+). Model predictions suggest that, in a dynamic environment, tracking the actions of conspecifics that are solving the same problem can yield superior learning to individual animals and enhanced performance to the group.

Indexed as

associative learningcollective intelligencecollective learninggroupsmathematical modellingreversal learning

Identifiers

PMID40144293
PMCPMC11937916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.