ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
An associative account of collective learning.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Exploration of Individual and Collective Reversal Learning in Rats.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Review
- An associative account of collective learning.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Associative learning is an important adaptive mechanism that is well conserved among a broad range of species. Although it is typically studied in isolated animals, associative learning can occur in the presence of conspecifics in nature. Although many social aspects of individual learning have received much attention, the study of collective learning-the acquisition of knowledge in groups of animals through shared experience-has a much shorter history. Consequently, the conditions under which collective learning emerges and the mechanisms that underlie such emergence are still largely unexplored. Here, we develop a parsimonious model of collective learning based on the complementary integration of associative learning and collective intelligence. The model assumes (i) a simple associative learning rule, based on the Rescorla-Wagner model, in which the actions of conspecifics serve as cues and (ii) a horse-race action selection rule. Simulations of this model show no benefit of group training over individual training in a simple discrimination task (A+/B-). However, a group-training advantage emerges after the discrimination task is reversed (A-/B+). Model predictions suggest that, in a dynamic environment, tracking the actions of conspecifics that are solving the same problem can yield superior learning to individual animals and enhanced performance to the group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.