Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144281›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Islamic law perspectives and social experiences on stigma toward disabled people in Indonesia.

Muktashim Billah, Abdul Qadir Gassing, Muammar Bakry, Kurniati Kurniati, Abdul Wahid Haddade, Darussalam Syamsuddin, La Ode Ismail Ahmad, Ahmad Harakan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muktashim BillahDepartment of Family Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Abdul Qadir GassingGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Muammar BakryGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Kurniati KurniatiGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Abdul Wahid HaddadeGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Darussalam SyamsuddinGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
La Ode Ismail AhmadGraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Ahmad HarakanDoctoral School of International Relations and Political Science, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stigmatization of disabled individuals remains a significant issue in Indonesia, particularly in Makassar, despite the existence of legal protections. This issue is further complicated by the intersection of religious and cultural norms, especially in Muslim-majority contexts. Islamic law (Maqāṣid al-Sharı̄'ah) provides a framework for dignity, intellect, and social justice, yet societal perceptions often contradict these principles. This study investigates how social stigma-manifested through harassment, insults, and negative labeling-aligns or conflicts with Islamic teachings on compassion and inclusion. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative interviews with key informants and quantitative survey data from 400 respondents, sampled using the Taro Yamane formula. The study examines the prevalence of stigma against disabled people and explores the role of Islamic perspectives in shaping societal attitudes. Results: Findings reveal that stigma against disabled individuals in Makassar is deeply embedded in social structures, often reinforcing their marginalization. While Islamic teachings promote inclusivity and protection of dignity, cultural misinterpretations and lack of awareness contribute to inconsistent application. The quantitative data indicate a strong correlation between negative labeling and social exclusion, while qualitative insights highlight the role of religious leaders and societal norms in shaping public perception. Discussion: The study highlights Maqāṣid al-Sharı̄'ah as a potential framework to counter stigma and advocate for more inclusive policies. However, societal resistance and entrenched biases pose challenges to implementation. Addressing these issues requires enhanced public education, stronger legal enforcement, and community engagement to shift societal attitudes toward disability rights. Conclusion: This research contributes to the discourse on Islamic social justice and disability rights, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to reducing stigma. Policy recommendations include involving disabled individuals in public decision-making, strengthening religious and legal discourse on inclusion, and promoting awareness campaigns to challenge societal prejudices. These efforts are essential to fostering a more equitable and inclusive society.

Indexed as

disabled peopleIslamic law perspectivesMaqasid al-Shariahsocial experiencesstigma

Identifiers

PMID40144281
PMCPMC11937077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.