ArticleJHLT open2024
Risk factors and clinical consequences of early extubation failure in lung transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Lung Transplant Surgery: Where Do We Stand?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prolonged intubation following lung transplantation is thought to delay recovery, yet a paucity of data exists regarding risk factors and outcomes related to extubation failure. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of 238 lung transplant recipients between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, to identify risk factors for extubation failure (intubation greater than 3 days, reintubation, and/or need for tracheostomy). We also assessed short-term outcomes relative to extubation success. Results: In this cohort, 144 patients (60%) were extubated successfully while 94 patients experienced extubation failure; 10 (11%) were intubated greater than 3 days, 9 (9%) were reintubated, 34 (36%) required tracheostomy after reintubation, and 41 (44%) underwent empiric tracheostomy. Recipient height and female sex, lung allocation score, 6-minute walk distance, donor ischemic time, ex-vivo perfusion, donor smoking history, intraoperative transfused red blood cells (packed red blood cells (PRBCs)), primary graft dysfunction at time zero, and comatose sedation state at day 2 were associated with extubation failure on univariate analysis (all Conclusions: Specific baseline donor and recipient demographics and intraoperative variables are associated with greater risk for post-transplant extubation failure. Patients with extubation failure have worse short-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.