ArticleJHLT open2024
Beneficial effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation over cardiopulmonary bypass in living-donor lobar lung transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been frequently used instead of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as extracorporeal circulatory support during cadaveric lung transplantation. This study compared the outcomes of intraoperative CPB or ECMO in living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT). Methods: CPB and ECMO were performed in 23 and 53 patients, respectively, who underwent initial bilateral LDLLT in our institution from 2008 to 2019. We retrospectively compared the short- and long-term outcomes between the 2 groups. Results: Patient background, graft size-matching data, operation time, extracorporeal circulation time, and bleeding amount were not significantly different in the 2 groups. However, the CPB group required more transfusion than the ECMO group (6,860 vs 3,840 ml, respectively; Conclusions: Intraoperative ECMO reduced primary graft dysfunction, possibly due to the lower requirement for intraoperative transfusion and less intraoperative weight gain causing systemic edema. The beneficial effect of ECMO in the early phase may result in less CLAD development in the long-term follow-up after LDLLT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.