Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144250›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2024

Impella 5.5 in left ventricular noncompaction syndrome as bridge to heart transplant.

Shriya Sharma, Jose Ruiz, Pankaj Garg, Juan Leoni, Parag Patel, Jose Nativi, Melissa Lyle, Rohan Goswami

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shriya SharmaDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jose RuizDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Pankaj GargDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Juan LeoniDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Parag PatelDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jose NativiDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Melissa LyleDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Rohan GoswamiDivision of Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular non-compaction syndrome (LVNC) is an uncommon congenital disease characterized by prominent trabeculations and deep inter-trabecular recesses of the left ventricle wall. We present the first reported case of Impella 5.5 use in LVNC as a bridge to transplant in a highly sensitized patient. Methods: A 50-year-old female with a family history of sudden cardiac death, LVNC cardiomyopathy associated with TPM1 gene mutation, and recurrent hospitalizations due to heart failure was listed for heart transplantation. She had severely reduced systolic function (EF 20%) and high panel reactive antibodies (PRA). She was admitted for desensitization therapy. Hospitalized, she escalated to Dobutamine and Milrinone due to progressive shock. Impella 5.5 was inserted, and inotropes were reduced as her condition steadied. She tolerated desensitization and eventually underwent heart transplantation after 120 days of continuous Impella 5.5 support without developing hemolysis or pump thrombosis. Results: Post-transplant she was found to have concern for left sided stroke symtpoms but completely recovered and remians stable on follow up at 6 months. Due to the lack of prospective trials with large cohorts, managing patients with LVNC and cardiogenic shock is challenging. Novel approaches to complex patients with both Impella 5.5 support and desensitization therapies should be considered in the appropriate setting. Conclusion: Our case highlights the use of mechanical circulatory support in the management of cardiogenic shock within a small left ventricluar cavity in a sensitized patient. This approach should be considered in high-risk patients in whom durable left ventricular assist therapy is not feasible.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockheart failureImpella 5.5LVADtransplant

Identifiers

PMID40144250
PMCPMC11935419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.