ArticleJHLT open2024
Is timing everything? Examining operative time in lung transplants from 2006 to 2023.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythms in solid organ transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Several studies have tried to find a link between timing of lung transplant surgery and patient outcomes. However, there has been conflicting results. This study sought to evaluate the association of operative times and recipient outcomes. Methods: Primary adults lung transplants were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were stratified based on time of lung transplant: T1 (12 AM-6 AM); T2 (6 AM-12 PM); T3 (12 PM-6 PM); T4 (6 PM-12 AM). Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Within the T4 group, there was a significant increase in length of stay and incidence of primary graft dysfunction, though minor. Unadjusted survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier methods demonstrated that there was no significant difference in long-term survival among the 4 groups ( Conclusions: Though operative times during the T4 period were associated with increased peri-operative complications, this had no effect on long-term survival. While thoracic transplantation can safely occur no matter what time of day, transplantation should preferentially be performed during normal surgical work hours for the longevity and work life balance of transplant providers and surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.