ArticleJHLT open2024
Hopes, expectations, and informational needs in patients undergoing advanced heart failure therapy evaluations.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing evaluation for advanced heart failure therapies (AHT) are at a critical juncture of their illness. Guidelines recommend shared decision-making with patients and caregivers; however, the approach and content of these discussions are unknown. Methods: Patients referred to a specialty palliative care service during AHT evaluation between October 2018 and September 2022 were identified from electronic health care records. Goals of care conversations documented in an advance care planning module were analyzed for participants, content, and timing before the transplant selection committee meeting. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of documented hopes, worries, shared prognostic communication, illness understanding, treatment expectations, and information preferences. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months to evaluate secondary processes and clinical outcomes. Results: Ninety-four patients (mean age 52.8 years, 76.6% male) met the criteria. Most patients (97.9%, Conclusions: Patients undergoing the AHT evaluation process face considerable uncertainty. A standardized approach by a specialty palliative care service elicits patients' illness understanding, hopes, worries, treatment expectations, and information preferences to promote shared decision-making at this critical time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.