ArticleJHLT open2024
Characteristics and outcomes of children determined to be noncandidates for heart transplant.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children being considered for heart transplantation (HT) undergo structured evaluation to determine HT candidacy. Some are determined not to be candidates after evaluation, but outcomes in these patients are not well known. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients evaluated for HT at our institution (freestanding children's hospital) between 2013 and 2022. Patients who completed HT evaluation but were determined not to be candidates were identified. Clinical characteristics, reasons for noncandidacy, and outcomes of these noncandidates were described using summary statistics. Results: During the study period, 264 patients were evaluated for HT. Of these, 75 patients (28.4%) were determined not to be candidates. The median age of noncandidates was 2.5 years. The most common diagnosis was single ventricle congenital heart disease (SV CHD) in 61.3%; cardiomyopathy was seen in 21.3%. The most common reason for noncandidacy was being too well for HT (36.7%), followed by too sick for HT (27.8%). With median follow-up duration of 3.5 years, 49.3% of patients were alive without undergoing HT; for noncandidates on the basis of being too well, 81.5% were alive without undergoing HT. Of the 36% of patients who died after determination of noncandidacy, 58.6% had SV CHD. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of children undergoing evaluation for HT are ultimately determined not to be candidates. Outcomes for noncandidates vary depending on the reason for noncandidacy. The majority of patients who died after determination of noncandidacy had SV CHD, indicating opportunities for increasing access to HT and other advanced therapies in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.