ArticleJHLT open2024
Trends in survival after heart transplantation based on Social Vulnerability Index in the United States.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lorlatinib and neurocognitive adverse events: characterization, risk factors, and the potentially mitigative role of social support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peri-and Post-operative Cardiac Surgery.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The association of social vulnerability (SV) and cardiac transplant survival remains poorly defined, particularly related to long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to define the impact of SV on survival among heart transplant recipients with at least 1 year of survival post-transplant. Methods: Heart transplant recipients were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database between June 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020. The Center for Disease Control's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) database was used to stratify patients based on SVI into 3 groups: low: <25; average: 26 to 74; high: 75+. The groups were analyzed with comparative statistics, and unadjusted survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. To determine the independent association between SVI and survival, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was created. Results: There were 27,740 recipients identified. High SVI patients more commonly identified as Black individuals and had a higher incidence of diabetes, pretransplant intensive care unit admission, and need for concomitant kidney transplant ( Conclusion: High or average SVI is independently associated with increased mortality following heart transplantation in patients with 1-year conditional survival. These findings demonstrate that disparities persist among heart transplant recipients during long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.