ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Exploring pain management in breast cancer: key findings from the ARISE study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Doxorubicin Bioavailability via Dissolving Microneedles: Roles of Drug Loading and Administration Force.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This ARISE study secondary analysis aims to delve into the complexities of pain management in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) in Italy. It aims to identify and analyze predictive variables for pain management adequacy and establish the relationship between these variables and the effectiveness of pain control. Materials and methods: This observational study engaged 2,104 participants from 13 Italian RT departments, focusing on 426 breast cancer patients reporting pain. Advanced statistical methods, were employed to identify significant predictive variables for pain management adequacy. Data collection involved a standardized form capturing personal, health-related information, specifics about cancer, pain intensity, and medication. The Pain Management Index (PMI) was used to evaluate pain management adequacy, where negative PMI values indicate inadequate or suboptimal pain management. Results: The analysis showed that 61.7% of patients experienced inadequate pain management (PMI<0). Factors identified as influencing pain management adequacy included the type of pain, patient age, the objective of RT, and the geographical location of the RT center. Notably, patients undergoing curative RT exhibited a higher incidence of inadequate pain management (PMI<0) compared to those undergoing palliative RT (82.9% versus 31.4%). Geographical variations were evident, with patients treated in northern Italy showing better pain management compared to those in central-southern Italy (72.0% versus 85.6%). Conclusion: The ARISE study underscores a significant inadequacy in pain management among breast cancer patients undergoing RT in Italy, influenced by a complex interplay of treatment-related, demographic, and regional factors. The study findings emphasize the need for enhanced, personalized pain management strategies and highlight the importance of considering a multifaceted approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.