ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Screening and prevention of gynecologic malignancies in patients with lynch syndrome: following the guidelines.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional and New Views on MSI-H/dMMR Endometrial Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer (Lynch Syndrome): An Emerging Public Health Concern.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS), a hereditary condition caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, significantly elevates the lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC) (40-60%) and ovarian cancer (8-10%) in affected women. Despite advances in colorectal cancer screening for LS patients, optimal strategies for gynecologic cancer prevention remain under debate. Current recommendations for EC surveillance, including annual transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial biopsy starting at age 30-35, lack robust evidence for effectiveness. Risk-reducing hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is frequently advised after childbearing to mitigate cancer risk. Emerging data suggest that hormonal interventions, such as oral contraceptives and progestin-based therapies, may reduce EC risk by up to 50%, offering non-surgical preventive options. Lifestyle modifications, including weight management and physical activity, further complement risk reduction strategies. Molecular diagnostic advancements, including immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing, enhance early identification of LS-associated gynecologic malignancies. For patients with advanced or recurrent EC, the integration of immunotherapy into treatment regimens has demonstrated significant efficacy. Agents such as pembrolizumab and dostarlimab, particularly in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, have improved progression-free and overall survival rates for patients with MMR-deficient tumors. This review highlights the need for personalized, evidence-based approaches to gynecologic cancer screening and prevention in LS, emphasizing the importance of integrating genetic testing, patient education, and novel therapeutic options. Future research should focus on refining screening protocols and expanding non-invasive preventive strategies to improve outcomes for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.