SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
ATM is associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity are associated with the prognosis of colorectal cancer, and the expression of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein plays an essential role in these processes. The present study examined the relationship between ATM expression and the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients and explored the underlying mechanism and promising therapeutic strategies. Method: A search including medical subject headings (MeSH), free terms, and combined words was conducted using Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Studies had to meet the inclusion criteria as well as include processes such as data extraction and quality evaluation. The survival outcomes were assessed using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity, and publication bias were analyzed, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Nine studies with 2883 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Low ATM expression level was related to poor overall survival (HR=0.542, 95% CI=0.447-0.637; P=0.000). Disease-free, progression-free, and recurrence-free survival rates were lower in patients with low ATM expression than in those with high ATM expression. There was no significant difference between Stage I-II and Stage III-IV colorectal cancer patients [risk ratio (RR)=1.173, 95% CI=0.970-1.417, P=0.690]. Conclusions: Low ATM expression level may be a marker of poor survival in colorectal cancer and contributes to resistance to therapy. Targeting related factors in these pathways to sensitize tumors to treatment is a potential therapeutic strategy, and monitoring ATM status could be a valuable guide independent of the immunotherapy or chemotherapy strategy used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.