Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144193›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2025

Public Health Decision-Maker Perspective on Joint Clinical Assessments in Central European EU Member States.

Gergő Merész, Dávid Dankó, Márk Péter Molnár

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gergő MerészMediConcept Ltd., H-1036 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-8359
Dávid DankóIdeas & Solutions Ltd., H-1114 Budapest, Hungary; david.danko@i-s.hu (D.D.); mark.molnar@i-s.hu (M.P.M.).
Márk Péter MolnárIdeas & Solutions Ltd., H-1114 Budapest, Hungary; david.danko@i-s.hu (D.D.); mark.molnar@i-s.hu (M.P.M.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HTA R introduces provisions that may benefit member states, in particular the opportunity to share national or regional assessment reports, cooperate outside of clinical domains, or use the methodological guidelines on a local level for technologies that are not subject to joint assessment. Challenges related to the timelines, differences between assessment scopes, and diverging guidance may jeopardize the full potential of the HTA R in Central European EU member states. However, these are more likely to be related to the commitment and vigilance of local competent authorities. We attempt to address these opportunities and mark some challenges imposed by the application of the HTA R by taking the perspective of public health decision-makers in Central European EU member states. We conclude that the foundations for capitalizing on the opportunities offered by the HTA R are already laid in the region, and we foresee policymakers and payers sharing the responsibility of acting as drivers of change in health policy to reduce the duplication (or multiplication) of efforts by HTDs, as well as to increase the efficient use of HTA bodies' resources.

Indexed as

decision-makinghealthhealth policyjoint clinical assessmentorganizationaltechnology assessmentvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40144193
PMCPMC11942879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.