ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Validity and reliability of the health belief model questionnaire for dietary patterns and physical activity in prediabetes.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development, psychometric evaluation, and application of an eco-driving questionnaire based on the Health Belief Model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe health belief model (HBM) questionnaire for dietary patterns and physical activity is important for assessing behavior in prediabetes subjects. Assessing health behavior important to design intervention that can control development of prediabetes. The study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the HBM questionnaire for dietary patterns and physical activity in prediabetes. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive method was used comprising validity and reliability tests; specifically, the content validity was assessed by 10 panelists of nutrition in public health and education experts. Meanwhile, face validity and reliability tests were performed by 10 and 30 respondents, respectively. Content validity was conducted quantitatively with the content validity index (CVI), kappa statistics score, along with qualitative assessment. The reliability test was carried out based on Cronbach's alpha.
resultsThe results showed that CVI analysis and kappa statistics obtained values between 0.77-1 and -5.24-0.99, respectively. The face validity analysis produced a value >1,5, while the reliability test obtained Cronbach's alpha value of 0,821. The final questionnaire was based on the recommendations of the panelists as well as the results of validity and reliability tests including 47 HBM item statements.
conclusionsThe HBM questionnaire was found to be valid and reliable for assessing behavior about dietary patterns and physical activity in prediabetic. This instrument could be used by healthcare providers in studies and clinical practice to measure behavior dietary patterns and physical activity as well as to develop interventions for prediabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.