Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144150›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025

Charting critical paths: Exploring how concept mapping amplifies nursing students' critical thinking and elevates patient care - A scoping review.

Maheswari Thapa, Seeta Devi, Rakhi Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maheswari ThapaDepartment of Nursing, Aliah University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Seeta DeviSymbiosis College of Nursing, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rakhi MishraCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concept mapping (CM) is a pedagogical approach that allows nursing students to improve their critical thinking (CT) abilities, which is paramount for providing quality patient care that underpins their ability to make sound clinical decisions and judgments by visually understanding the relationships and interconnections between various concepts. The purpose of the present review was to assess the outcome of CM on the CT skills. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, and other sources to evaluate the effect of CM on CT among nursing students. The review included articles published between 2012 and 2023. Two authors individually extracted the data, identified the bias risk, and analyzed the data using the PRISMA-ScR framework. Database searches found 985 articles, 11 of which matched the inclusion criteria. 63.64% employed quasi-experimental approaches. 45.45% employed concept mapping instead of integration, whereas 9.09% used sophisticated technology. Second-year BSc Nursing students accounted for 54.55%. In 45.45% of the studies, sample sizes varied between 51 and 100. The studies' overall post-test CT scores were higher in groups which received CM as compared to other conventional pedagogical approaches. Most studies demonstrated minimal bias risk and P values greater than 0.05. The findings of the present study considered CM as an effective teaching method to enhance CT skills and also suggest the implementation of CM. It is recommended that nursing educators, administrators, and faculty evaluate curriculum to integrate CM into courses focused at promoting CT abilities in nursing students to improve the quality of patient care.

Indexed as

Concept mappingconcept mapscritical thinkingeffectivenessimpactnursingstudentstraditional teaching method

Identifiers

PMID40144150
PMCPMC11940023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.