ArticleMedical science educator2025
A critical Exploration of Theoretical Frameworks for Reflective Learning: Reflections from a Faculty Development Workshop.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faculty training in reflective practice is essential, given the importance of this skill for health professionals. There are several reflective practice frameworks available; however, facilitators' experiences with these frameworks vary depending on the learning context (i.e. various types of teaching and learning activities). This commentary discusses the practicality of four reflective learning frameworks, i.e. Kolb's experiential learning framework, Gibbs' reflective cycle, Schön's reflective practice model, and the "What" model. Integrating the "What" model into the Gibbs' reflective cycle or Kolb's experiential learning framework is recommended to enhance learners' comprehension and application of the reflective process through a simple and practical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.