Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144085›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Exploring Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Medical Students: Analysis of a Global Survey.

Jason Luong, Chih-Chen Tzang, Sean McWatt, Cecilia Brassett, Dana Stearns, Mandeep G Sagoo, Carol Kunzel, Takeshi Sakurai, Chung-Liang Chien, Geoffroy Noel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medical Students' Readiness for Medical Artificial Intelligence (AI).Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jason LuongColumbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, NY USA.
Chih-Chen TzangNational Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sean McWattSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON Canada.
Cecilia BrassettUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Dana StearnsHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
Mandeep G SagooKing's College London, London, UK.
Carol KunzelColumbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, NY USA.
Takeshi SakuraiKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Chung-Liang ChienNational Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Geoffroy NoelDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA USA.
Anette WuDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-7200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in diverse fields, including medical education, has emerged as a pivotal topic as the integration of AI technologies is becoming increasingly prevalent. This research delved into the landscape of AI integration in academic settings aimed to evaluate the students' readiness for the evolving AI landscape in medical education. Materials and Methods: Participants were recruited from the International Collaboration and Exchange Program (ICEP) in the fall of 2023. An online survey was conducted to collect data on demographics, the landscape of AI utilization in academic settings, and the perceived readiness levels related to AI from 223 participants. The Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) was used. Results: Results indicated that 41.82% of participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that AI education should be part of medical training. Overall levels of AI readiness exhibited a statistically significant positive correlation with the frequency of AI inclusion in the curriculum ( Conclusions: This study offers valuable insights into the ongoing discussion on the role of AI in education, providing a foundation for educators to consider the integration of AI into their educational framework. The implementation of AI education could potentially enhance students' AI readiness, considering the multiple benefits this symbiosis can offer. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02190-x.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGlobal surveyMedical educationStudent readinessTechnology integration

Identifiers

PMID40144085
PMCPMC11933632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.