ArticleMedical science educator2025
Scholarly Concentrations: A Students' Perspective on Their Role in the Residency Selection Process and Career Trajectory.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study examines the students' perspective on the Scholarly Concentrations Program (SCP) at Morsani College of Medicine (MCOM) with respect to developing a habit of inquiry and life-long learning in the practice of medicine, career trajectory, and residency matching. Analyzing the students' self-assessment of their SCP experience provides added insight into the overall effectiveness of the SCP. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered electronically to 4th year medical students at the USF Morsani College of Medicine after Match Day between 2013 and 2022. Results: Students from all scholarly concentrations were more likely to be asked during interviews about their participation in SCP (53%) than not, and many students not asked about their participation initiated the conversation on their own (35%). The assessment of the role of SCP participation in matching was varied. SCP participation did not influence students' choice of specialty (84%). Many students indicated that the SCP experience would help them be more successful in residency (64%). Most students sought residency programs that emphasized research (65%) and indicated a desire to practice medicine in an academic setting (70%). Conclusion: This self-assessment shows that students value the SCP experience and that the experience motivated them to continue the pursuit of scholarship. SCP participation was a topic of conversation during most interviews across all concentrations, although students were not sure whether it contributed to successful matching. The data indicate that residency programs value participation in the SCP as well as research experiences as indicators of success in residency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.