ArticleDigital health
Feasibility and acceptability of a remote computerized cognitive training employing telehealth in older adults with subjective cognitive complaints.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The past, present, and future of Alzheimer's disease-part 3: the future.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Review
- Feasibility, Usability and Acceptance of a Multi-Component Cognitive Intervention Using Immersive Virtual Reality and Telemedicine in Individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mentes ativas (active minds): effects of a remote cognitive stimulation program.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- Effect of exercise intervention on elderly patients with sarcopenia: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Computerized cognitive training (CCT) represents promising solutions for remote training of cognitive abilities in older people with cognitive decline. In the present article, we tested the feasibility and acceptability of a CCT performed at home via a telehealth platform, with participants connected remotely to a clinician, in comparison to an in-person CCT. Methods: Thirty participants took part in the study. Twelve participants opted for classical in-person training and met a neuropsychologist twice a week for 12 weeks, for a total of 24 30-minute sessions. Eighteen participants opted for the remote home-based training and met with the clinician virtually via a telehealth system at the same frequency and duration. The intervention consisted of a serious-game platform training memory, spatial abilities, and executive functions. All participants underwent a neuropsychological and clinical assessment before and after the training. Results: Results showed a high adherence to training and a strong acceptability in both the remote and the in-person groups. A significant improvement in mental flexibility and planning abilities was observed in both groups (as measured by the Zoo planning test), but no other neuropsychological tests showed improvement. Discussion: This non-randomized study suggests the feasibility and acceptability of the telehealth CCT intervention. When participants are able to select their preferred intervention modality, training adherence and efficacy are comparable between remote and in-person delivery. Future studies should be performed to verify which are the most effective intervention parameters, such as training frequency and duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.