ArticleDigital health
Adopting telehealth service for lymphedema care: Insights from a Filariasis Management Clinic, Puducherry, India.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient perspectives and barriers to effective home-based care in lymphatic filariasis: A mixed methods study from Puducherry, India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Technology-enhanced compression and AI-integrated lymphedema care: a narrative review.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Review
- Self-management of lower limb lymphedema at home following gynecologic cancer surgery: a qualitative study of women's experiences and challenges.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease affecting communities in tropical and subtropical regions marked by poor socio-economic conditions. Regular hospital-based follow-up and home-based Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) are below par among LF patients due to reasons ranging from travelling costs to stigma. Telehealth interventions are suggested as a promising adjunct tool in such scenarios, integrating medical expertise and accessibility, but rarely used for LF. This article reflects on the insights from an LF clinic on the potential of telehealth interventions in enabling patients to access medical care and improving their home-based MMDP. Despite challenges like poor digital literacy and access to technology, the telehealth service facilitated remote consultations and dissemination of educational materials, allowing clinicians to monitor patient conditions and provide necessary medical guidance. The approach has shown substantial potential in improving lymphedema care, particularly in resource-limited settings, by offering a feasible solution to the barriers faced by traditional healthcare delivery. The pilot program underscores the importance of continued research and adaptation to optimize telehealth interventions for chronic disease management, ensuring comprehensive and accessible care for underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.