ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Assessing female call responses to syllable level details in song.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mate choice is a critical decision-making process, having lasting impacts on an individual's time, energy, and reproductive success. Across songbirds, females are generally assumed to prefer higher song rates, greater complexity, and higher quality performances; however, there is growing evidence implicating syllable level details in songbird communication. Here, we build on our previous psychoacoustic results to ask whether female zebra finches use the kinds of syllable level details that they are capable of hearing. Female zebra finches produce calls during male songs as a component of courtship. These calls can be leveraged to explore how females assess and interact with male songs. To test whether syllable level details are behaviorally relevant in a courtship context, we quantified female call responses to manipulated songs in four experiments. First, we validated that our playback procedure elicited robust calling responses from females (Exp 1). Next, we found that females decreased calling to songs where syllables were spectro-temporally reversed (REVERSAL), but did not respond differently if the syllable order was manipulated (SHUFFLED). Females also modulated their calling when experimental songs were composed of natural rendition-to-rendition variation in song syllables (RENDITION) relative to songs consisting of a single repeated rendition (FIXED) (Exp 2). Furthermore, we found that females decreased calling responses even when only a portion of syllables were spectro-temporally reversed (Exp 4). Across these experiments, we also report the striking extent to which females habituated to a male's song (Exps 3 and 4). To maximize female responses, we tried adjusting the paradigm in Exps 3 and 4 to increase female calling. However, our adjustments had minimal effects, consistent with the notion that females rapidly decreased calling in response to a given males' stimuli. Altogether, our results contribute to growing evidence that syllable level details in birdsong are behaviorally relevant, and, perhaps more importantly, demonstrate that birds' enhanced ability to discriminate acoustic fine structure as shown in psychophysical tests plays a role in communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.