ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
The Strategy of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- International expert consensus-driven surgical process model for robot-assisted hysterectomy: Delphi study results.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pioneering telesurgery in gynecology: the first European case of total hysterectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The New Concepts from New Evidences.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic hysterectomy has emerged as a superior surgical approach for patients with obesity, providing significant benefits including reduced incidence of myocardial infarction, peripheral nerve injury, wound infections, and urinary tract infections. However, these unique considerations require careful attention when managing such cases. Therefore, this study aimed to propose several key strategies for achieving optimal outcomes, including maintaining a mild Trendelenburg position (12°), ensuring the patient's secure positioning, avoiding the lithotomy position, considering a slightly higher pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure (12 mmHg), and using a 30° endoscope for improved visualization rather than a 0° endoscope. We present three cases of stage IA atypical endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. All three patients underwent robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with body mass indices of 53.3, 43.8, and 43.7 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.