Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143983›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

The Strategy of Robot-assisted Hysterectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity.

Junji Mitsushita, Chiaki Banzai, Akina Matsumoto, Emi Motegi, Katsuya Imai, Shuhei Watanabe, Tomomi Murata, Masayuki Soda

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The New Concepts from New Evidences.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junji MitsushitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Chiaki BanzaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Akina MatsumotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Emi MotegiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Katsuya ImaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Shuhei WatanabeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Tomomi MurataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Masayuki SodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic hysterectomy has emerged as a superior surgical approach for patients with obesity, providing significant benefits including reduced incidence of myocardial infarction, peripheral nerve injury, wound infections, and urinary tract infections. However, these unique considerations require careful attention when managing such cases. Therefore, this study aimed to propose several key strategies for achieving optimal outcomes, including maintaining a mild Trendelenburg position (12°), ensuring the patient's secure positioning, avoiding the lithotomy position, considering a slightly higher pneumoperitoneum insufflation pressure (12 mmHg), and using a 30° endoscope for improved visualization rather than a 0° endoscope. We present three cases of stage IA atypical endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. All three patients underwent robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with body mass indices of 53.3, 43.8, and 43.7 kg/m

Indexed as

Atypical endometrial hyperplasiabody mass indexendometrial cancerpatients with obesityrobot-assisted hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID40143983
PMCPMC11936405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.