ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
The Impact of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Application during Cystectomy and Drainage in Endometrioma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The New Concepts from New Evidences.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to determine the impact of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) during cystectomy and drainage on recurrence and ovarian reserve. Materials and Methods: Women aged 18-45 years with endometrioma (pathologically confirmed) who underwent conservative laparoscopy surgery (cystectomy and drainage) using ORC at Fatmawati General Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia, were included in this study. All surgeries were done by complete excision of all endometriosis lesions (especially for excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis and adenomyosis resection). All patients were followed up for 1 year, and the recurrence rate and postoperative anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) were evaluated. Results: Twenty patients were included in the cystectomy group and 19 in the drainage group. The researchers found the result was not significant ( Conclusion: Cystectomy with ORC significantly reduces ovarian reserve. Drainage followed by insertion of ORC to the cyst cavity can be an option to maintain ovarian reserve with a risk of recurrence that is not significantly different from cystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.