ArticleJPRAS open2025
Aesthetic preferences for male breast: Analysis of 2282 surveys on the Chinese population.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the prevalence of male breast surgery rises in China, there is a growing need to further investigate the aesthetic standards associated with male breasts among Chinese population. Method: An interactive online survey featuring computerized images of a Chinese male breast was developed. Various attributes of male breasts were manipulated through digital editing using imaging software (Adobe Photoshop CS5; Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, Calif.). Participants were asked to evaluate the images and identify the most attractive male breast. Demographic information was gathered, and analysis of variance was employed to clarify preferences regarding male breast aesthetics. Results: A total of 2282 complete responses were obtained. Of these, 1244 (54.5%) were from female participants, while 1038 (45.5%) were from male participants. In the frontal view, 66.17% of respondents favored a 2 cm nipple-areola complex (NAC), and 72.6% preferred a 5/8 NN-to-Chest ratio. In the lateral view, 57.8% preferred a flat breast projection, and 54.29% favored a 30° superior pole projection angle. Significant correlations were identified between gender, age, practice type and marital status. Conclusion: Our study outlines the characteristics of an aesthetically appealing male breast. The analysis of the 2282 survey responses can provide valuable insights for surgical decision-making in chest contouring and reshaping procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.