ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Access to Pediatric Asthma Specialty Care: A Survey and Geospatial Analysis Across a Rural State.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of rurality, child opportunity, and distance with use of pediatric asthma specialists.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Identifying Endocrinology Nurse Practitioners and Physician Associates Using Claims Data.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Although children with asthma have improved outcomes when accessing asthma specialists (allergist/immunologists and pediatric pulmonologists), this care may not be available if no specialists are located nearby, or if nearby specialists do not accept children or a given child's insurance. We aimed to describe the physical proximity of children to pediatric asthma specialty care in a largely rural state and to assess the degree to which the availability of pediatric specialty asthma care was impacted by provider nonacceptance of pediatric patients and patients with Medicaid insurance. Methods: We conducted a telephone survey of pediatric pulmonology and allergy/immunology practices in the rural state of Maine and adjacent areas during June and July 2024, asking whether they accepted pediatric patients, whether they accepted pediatric patients with Maine Medicaid insurance, and their wait times for new patient appointments. We assessed the association of acceptance policies and clinician specialty (allergy vs pulmonology), training (physician vs advanced practice provider), and state (Maine vs other) using Fisher's exact tests and we calculated the travel time to the nearest provider locations for children across Maine. Results: Among 49 asthma specialists in and around Maine, 41 (84%) accepted pediatric patients. Eighty-nine percent of Maine providers and 6% of out-of-state providers accepted children with Maine Medicaid insurance. The median distance to any asthma specialist was 30.5 minutes (IQR 17.2, 51.0) and 18% of children would need to travel >60 minutes for care. Conclusion: Nearly one in five children in Maine would be required to travel more than 60 minutes to reach an asthma specialist, nearly one in five allergy providers do not accept children, and few out of state providers accept Maine Medicaid insurance. Future research should assess the impacts of these barriers on children's receipt of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.