ArticleJHLT open2024
Evaluating longitudinal cytomegalovirus-specific humoral immune responses and association with DNAemia risk in seropositive lung transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral infection among lung transplant recipients and is associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. There is a need for better therapeutics as well as biomarkers to enable effective stratification of CMV seropositive patient risk for developing CMV DNAemia to inform prophylaxis duration. Methods: CMV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding and functional responses were evaluated in a discovery cohort of longitudinal plasma samples from 51 CMV seropositive human lung transplant recipients, collected as part of the clinical trials in organ transplantation (CTOT)-20 and CTOT-22 consortium studies. Pre-transplant plasma from an additional 43 CMV seropositive lung transplant recipients was evaluated as a validation cohort. Results: In the discovery cohort with longitudinal samples, pre-transplant plasma IgG binding to CMV surface glycoproteins glycoprotein H (gH)/glycoprotein L (gL), gH/gL/glycoprotein O (gO), and pentameric complex, as well as neutralization of CMV in epithelial cells, is associated with increased risk of CMV DNAemia post-prophylaxis. However, these results were not confirmed by the validation cohort. Conclusions: While quantification of pre-transplant CMV-specific antibody responses showed association with DNAemia in the discovery cohort, additional clinical variables and/or known risk factors for CMV, such as patient CMV-specific T-cell responses, may need to be considered in combination with humoral immunity to effectively stratify risk of CMV DNAemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.