ArticleJHLT open2024
In-person versus virtual heart transplantation selection committee meetings: Longer-term impact on committee member perceptions and patient selection outcomes.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in heart transplantation, including transitioning from in-person to virtual selection committee meetings. The longer-term impact of this transition on committee perceptions and patient selection outcomes has not been described. An anonymous survey was administered to our institution's selection committee. Among 58 regular attendees, there were 21 physician and 21 nonphysician respondents. Selection outcomes were compared for patients discussed during in-person meetings (March 1, 2017-March 14, 2020) with those of virtual meetings (March 15, 2020-March 31, 2023). Though a virtual format was generally preferred, respondents highlighted a lack of accountability and spontaneous discussion. Among the 529 patients evaluated during the study period, there was a significant difference in selection outcomes between the virtual and in-person cohorts owing to lower rates of deferral and higher rates of approval in the virtual era overall (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.