ArticleJHLT open2024
Donor-derived cell-free DNA, gene expression profile, and acute rejection in donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute rejection (AR) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. There is limited data on donation after circulatory death (DCD) HTx recipients where ischemia reperfusion injury may contribute to the development of AR and may be detected early with noninvasive biomarkers, such as donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and gene expression profile (GEP). The goal of this study is to compare dd-cfDNA, GEP, and rejection outcomes in DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) HTx recipients. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included DCD and DBD HTx recipients from January 2020 to September 2022. Patients were excluded from the study if dd-cfDNA and GEP were not available. The CareDx HeartCare platform was used to obtain dd-cfDNA (AlloSure-Heart) and GEP (AlloMap) with the highest values for each patient recorded at 6 and 12 months. The mean values for these noninvasive markers were compared between DCD and DBD groups. Patients were followed for clinical outcomes, including treated AR, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and death, through September 2023. Results: A total of 156 HTx patients were included with 50 DCD and 106 DBD recipients. Baseline characteristics were similar between DCD and DBD recipients including mean age (58.5 vs 56.9 years, Conclusions: In this single-center study, there were no significant differences in mean dd-cfDNA and treated AR at 1 year between DCD and DBD HTx recipients. There was a significant increase in mean GEP at 6 months, but not at 12 months in the DBD cohort. Overall, there does not appear to be clinically significant cardiac allograft injury related to DCD as measured by noninvasive markers. Further work is needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.