ArticleJHLT open2024
Quantifying the effects of training in lung transplantation: Lessons from NASA.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sequential lung transplantation is a complex procedure. The traditional training model continues to center around operative experience with progressively increasing delegation of stages of the procedure. However, little evidence exists on the effects this has on surgical trainers. The NASA-TLX is a subjective, multidimensional assessment tool that rates perceived workload. We sought to employ this as a means of assessing the impact that training in lung transplantation has on trainers. Methods: We prospectively collected the NASA-TLX data for 60 patients undergoing bilateral sequential lung transplantation. In 30 cases, the operation was performed entirely by the senior surgeon (SS) who implanted both lungs. In 30 operations, the senior surgeon implanted the right lung (SSR) and supervised a trainee implanting the left lung (TL). Results: The overall weighted rating was significantly lower for the surgeons undertaking the case themselves rather than training ( Conclusions: The NASA task load index can be used to inform the effects of training in lung transplantation on trainers. Training leads to greater mental and temporal demands with less effect on other factors. Crucially, there was no significant difference in perceived performance. As the specialty continues to be confronted with diverse challenges, this study should give confidence to those training the transplant surgeons of the future, as well as provide them with a mechanism to reflect on their own training performance. ACGME Competencies: Interpersonal and communication skills.Practice-based learning and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.