Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40143901›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2024

Hyperpolarized

Austin Simmons, David Mummy, Shuo Zhang, Suphachart Leewiwatwong, Scott Palmer, Bastiaan Driehuys, Hakim Azfar Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Austin SimmonsCampbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Buies Creek, North Carolina.
David MummyDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Shuo ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Suphachart LeewiwatwongDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Scott PalmerDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Bastiaan DriehuysDepartment of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Hakim Azfar AliDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is currently no sensitive, noninvasive method of screening for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the primary barrier to long-term survival after lung transplant. Conventional pulmonary function testing is imprecise absent a sustained decline. Hyperpolarized Methods: Adult patients, post bilateral lung transplant, were screened for CLAD based on the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria. Those with established allografts ( Results: The analysis included 9 lung transplant recipients, 7 with CLAD and 2 without. CLAD patients exhibited VDP values consistent with their forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Conclusions: Patients with CLAD exhibited significant ventilation defects that correlated with FEV

Indexed as

129Xe MRICLADfunctional lung imaginglung transplantspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40143901
PMCPMC11935353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.