ArticleJHLT open2024
Differential effects of donor factors on post-transplant survival in lung transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heart-lung transplantation-global activity between 2003 and 2023, indications and outcomes.JHLT open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Predicting post-transplant (PT) survival in lung allocation remains an elusive goal. We analyzed the impact of donor factors on PT survival and how these relationships vary among transplant recipients. Methods: We studied primary bilateral lung transplant recipients ( Results: Interactions between donor and recipient factors emerged by age: lower survival for donation after circulatory death organs for recipients aged 55 to 69 years, donor smoking for recipients aged 30 to 54 and 70+, Hispanic donor for recipients <30, non-Hispanic Black donor for recipients aged 30+; sex: cytomegalovirus mismatch for males; diagnosis: higher donor recipient weight ratio for diagnosis group C (e.g., cystic fibrosis), donor diabetes for diagnosis group D (e.g., idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). COX and RF models performed similarly to PT-CAS; however, the combined COX + PT-CAS model had improved discrimination (1-year area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] PT-CAS 0.609 vs 1-year AUC COX + PT-CAS 0.626) and improved calibration across a broader range of predicted risk. Conclusions: The influence of donor factors on recipient PT survival differed by age, sex, and diagnosis. The addition of donor factors to existing models predicting PT survival led to only modest improvement in prediction accuracy. Future efforts may focus on optimizing matching strategies to improve donor utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.